It is refreshing that there remains someone among us being the Language Police. Clearly not to put Language Police into quotes for the emphasis I saw my error in doing so and will make amends to frame my communications with proper emphasis and references. Language when written tempers the soul and clears the mind, unless the person writing is being paid and pressured to be rhetorical, absurd, critical, and abusive which was the recent case of MoveOn.Org and Media Matters.org.  

The homosexual community needs Language Police to refine its word usage so as to return to some semblance of tempered imagination.  The written indication from this group indicates that somehow somewhere homosexual men have faced severe discrimination in social and/or employment situations. This group selfishly and unjustly attacks the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts.  They attempt to merge the action and the being into one; ergo, if a priest is homosexual then he should be free to openly expose his homosexuality. Such behavior is contrary to Church teachings and the man being an adult should be mature enough to make up his mind as what is his true vocation; ergo, living life as a homosexual or living life as a priest. Making closed decisions is part of making maturity in life happen. The needs of private intimacy have never been condemned by church or by confessional and homosexual men at life in the Catholic Church know this. The homosexual community, likewise, knows the rules regarding close contact with preteen boys and the importance of prescribed behavior with these young developing lives and minds. The homosexual community, nevertheless, takes exception thus to formulate arguments that there has been discrimination and evil malicious abuse and treatment towards them. Their thinking is prejudiced, spurious and unjustified.

Destroying language is something which needs attention from now on; ergo, the homosexual community has usurped the adjective “gay” turning this word into a misnomer. In essence, “gay” has nothing to do with sexual preference. It may well have to do with having a gay and wonderful sexual experience which should be the happy description of a honeymoon or initial breakdown of emotional barriers between lovers.  The homosexual community has taken this wonderful word out of the general lexicon for everyone to use and thus the language theft requires the Language Police.

The same goes for the ringing nauseous repetition “Gay Marriage”. The homosexual community has created this couplet of imagination with determination to make the ethereal real. By Goebbels repetition, this nonsense becomes common usage making a turned phrase into a zero-sum gambit turning friends into foes. Society has not forbidden adults of same sex sexuality from living life together. If there are to be adjustments it is to the structure of the relationship relative to employment benefits, health benefits and passage of life estates from one party in a relationship to another. None of these legal protections need politics or structural change of societal norms. Such mature constraints have not stopped the language thieves from usurping further legitimate social concepts for their own selfish purposes.

Poetically and inspirationally it is refreshing to create new language and to see if in fact the new terms find acceptance before Funk & Wagnall or imperator avec de Societe’ de Langue Francaise or categorized in the OED. So be it with my newism (another one) in frame similar to editrix or aviatrix the word “bartendrix” to depict the female serving drinks behind the bar at the local pub or tavern

Now the homosexual community has driven in high gear bulldozing all opposition with their creation “homophobe” which supplements a Latin and Greek origination into a couplet of dubious definition. “Homo” is the term of defined science for applications of the human corpus; ergo, “Homo Erectus” for both male or a female. “Phobe” is from the Greek as a reference to fear of the gods. A “Phobic” was at odds with the spiritual forces at work in homes and fields; ergo, a sinner chased and haunted by an avenging god or goddess. Phobics dwelled in caves or scurried in the middle of the night to escape their fears of the god’s wrath; ergo, being a phobic hiding from the gods is not a good thing.

This term “homophobic”, by this description, is one hiding from the new gods and goddesses that make up the homosexual community. It is a term with an intrinsic sense of threat imposed by it; ergo, oppose us and risk the consequences which is the case in fact when confronting the wrath of the homosexual community. So now with language to suppose opposition of one one couplet with another I change "homosexual community" to "Homosexual Communists" and to Hell with them all.